The war of words heats up. Israeli and
US leaders are all over the airwaves, saying Israel has a right to
defend itself and that Hamas is responsible for all deaths on both
sides. The news organizations feel they have to have some reporters
in Gaza for a change. They keep trying to spin the news in Israel's
favor, but once they're showing even a little bit of the reality on
the ground, it all starts looking really bad for the Israelis with
each new dead Palestinian child buried beneath the rubble. The US
Secretary of State goes to Israel and defends the regime there.
A few days of Israeli atrocities later,
he or she starts to make slightly less fanatically pro-Israel noises.
The Israeli spokespeople stick to their guns (and their drones,
helicopters, fighter jets, tanks, and destroyers). As the hours and
days pass with all the nonstop news coverage, the Israeli
spokesgenerals and politicians start looking rabid, even to many of
their apologists in the west.
Across the globe, the ever-nascent,
uncomfortably diverse movement of people in solidarity with
Palestinians protests. In some places they attack synagogues,
believing that Israel represents the Jews of the world, as its
leaders have been claiming every day since 1948. They are denounced
as anti-Semites. (With some apparent justification in this case.)
In other places the occasional Israeli embassy gets overrun by angry
protesters. In most places, hundreds, thousands, or tens of
thousands of people or more gather weekly, sometimes more often, to
decry Israel's war crimes.
The Israeli spokesgenerals remind us
that not only must Israel defend itself from foreign terrorist
aggression, but how can Israel even think about talking to Hamas,
when Hamas refuses to recognize Israel's right to exist? The term
“right to exist” is never explained by them, or by the vast
majority of the western media outlets, ever. No one ever asks where are the borders of this state called Israel. Such an obvious
question, but you'll rarely find it asked anywhere outside of
Pacifica Radio or Al-Jazeera. How can they recognize a country that
refuses to acknowledge where its own borders begin and end? It's a
non-question, that goes perpetually unanswered by anyone but the
terrorists and their apologists.
I ask that question, and I'm called a
terrorist sympathizer for doing so. I sing at the protests, wherever
in the world I happen to be at the time of Israel's current spate of
atrocities. If I'm home in Portland, I sing for dozens, maybe
hundreds, of protesters, half of them university students of Arab
origin. If I'm lucky enough to be outside of the US at the time –
Australia, England, Denmark, Sweden – I sing for thousands. I
literally profit, in terms of CD sales and an increased fan base,
every time Israel drops lots of bombs on Palestinians. (Kind of like
Lockheed, if you remove the last nine zeros or so.)
I hear from old and new friends,
thanking me for the latest song about the latest atrocity. I hear from other people
who had been fans until they heard the last song, who tell me I'm an
anti-Semite, or at the very least, “one-sided.” Social media
lights up with praise and denunciations – of Israel, of Hamas, of
the BDS movement, of me. To varying degrees of course, depending.
I do gigs, and I sing more songs about
Palestine than I normally do. Most people respond with more
enthusiasm than usual, especially outside of the US, where the media
is somewhere between a little and a lot better, where they're more
likely to be tired of seeing pictures of the dead or dying victims of
Israel's latest bombing of a UN compound packed with terrified refugees
who they've recently made homeless.
The most vocal support comes from Arabs
and Jews. The most vocal opposition comes from Jews, too. The
handful of people at each gig who don't clap after I sing “Jenin”
are Jews who resemble my grandparents' neighbors in Brooklyn. One of
them might walk out of the show at that point. The rest stay.
There is some debate in the media.
More or less depending on which media, which country. About Israeli history, the plight of the Palestinians in the refugee camps, about UN Resolution 242 and the right of return. There is much more discussion than usual about
whether artists like me are anti-Semitic terrorist supporters or
brave dissenters against Zionism and empire. The web is more full
than usual with racist denunciations, hostile ranting, and the
occasional, eloquent defense of a principled position.
Far right Israelis in Tel Aviv and
Haifa and on the settlements gather in large numbers, repeating such
chants as “kill the Arabs” and “gas the Arabs.” The western
media ignores these protests. Jews are holocaust survivors and they
don't believe in that sort of thing. They would never say things
like that. Even though thousands of them do. On camera.
Bearded men somewhere in Gaza talk
about killing the Jews. The only Jews they've ever met have been the
ones who bomb them from the air or shoot them from inside tanks, but
no one in the media explains that fact. You'll see them chanting
about killing Jews, anyway, which is the important bit. You'll see
their kids saying it, too. That's how they raise their kids, you
know.
Some people make generally sensible
comparisons between Israeli policies and Nazi Germany. Mostly the people making those
comparisons are Jews, but some others dare make them, too. They are
all denounced at crazed anti-Semites (including the Jews).
Other people say Israeli policies are
terrible, but there are other countries that do even worse things, so
why do you focus so much on Israel? Perhaps this Israel focus is a
veiled form of anti-Semitism, because we're ignoring some other
place. It's a strange argument.
For some of us, this focus on Israel is
partly because it's not some other place. It's Israel. Growing up
in the Connecticut suburbs of New York City, I thought Israel was
somewhere near New Jersey. Half the people I meet around there have
cousins in Tel Aviv. Who are right now killing people in Gaza with
American weapons, American money and American political cover. For
all kinds of reasons, it's personal. A lot of the people doing the
killing have New York accents. Many of the rest are from the part of
the world that us Ashkenazis came from. It's personal.
I hear from apologists for Israel who
lecture me knowingly about how Israel is “just doing to the
Palestinians what you did to the Native Americans.” Which of course makes everything
OK. And if that line of reasoning doesn't seem to be working, they
tell me about how they're under attack by crazed Islamists and so
they have to defend themselves with indiscriminate slaughter of the
families of the Islamists, and anybody else who lives nearby. I
wouldn't understand, they say. Their line of reasoning there is a
bit outdated, since 9/11, but no matter.
Israeli leaders make noises like what
they really want to do is completely overrun Gaza to wipe out the
“terrorist infrastructure” once and for all. Secretly, they know
that the only way this would be possible would be by committing
actual genocide, in the sense of actually physically bulldozing the
entire place, one building at a time (like the Nazis did in the Warsaw Ghetto, or like the US did in Hue and Fallujah),
and forcing the entire population to flee across Egypt's locked
borders or to die. Secretly, the Israeli government knows it's not
prepared for the fallout that would result from that kind of thing.
Secretly, they want to have an excuse to call off their murderous
campaign.
Hamas will run out of missiles. The US
will suddenly find success in their pathetic efforts to negotiate a
ceasefire because Israel secretly is in favor of one now, though they
don't want to admit it to much of their population, or to the
Palestinians. Israel will publicly agree to some of Hamas's demands.
They won't lift the siege, but they'll partially lift it. They'll
free a few prisoners.
Almost all of the western journalists
will leave Gaza. A few weeks later, Israel will go back on
everything, collectively punishing the entire Palestinian population for the rogue action
of some Salafist through more indiscriminate bombing of Palestinian
homes and a reimposition of the embargo. They'll also announce more
settlement-building in the West Bank, for good measure.
I'll write another song on the next
chapter in the annals of Israeli occupation. This time very few
people will notice. There will be the occasional small protest. The
hardcore few among the perennial activists will discuss tactics,
wondering how it might ever be possible to mobilize a sustained
movement against Israeli apartheid.
They'll keep wondering, until the next
time enough blood is spilled to warrant the attention of the world's
media. Because slow starvation isn't interesting enough.
3 comments:
Considering your words.
So far, so true. But I hope for otherwise this time. I don't know what's going to change it (apart from enough people deciding not to go back to normal until the change comes - but what could make that happen this time when it didn't the last times, I don't know). I just know change builds up and happens when many people still think it's hopeless.
Another gem, always appreciate your thoughfulness and historical perspective, plus some great links.
Post a Comment